Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Consciousness. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Consciousness. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Bảy, 19 tháng 11, 2016

Harvard scientists think they've pinpointed the physical source of consciousness

Scientists have struggled for millennial understand human consciousness - the awareness of one's existence. Despite advances in neuroscience, we still don't really know where it comes from, and how it arises.

But researchers think they might have finally figured out its physical origins, after pinpointing a network of three specific regions in the brain that appear to be crucial to consciousness.

It's a pretty huge deal for our understanding of what it means to be human, and it could also help researchers find new treatments for patients in vegetative states.



"For the first time, we have found a connection between the brainstem region involved in arousal and regions involved in awareness, two prerequisites for consciousness," said lead researcher Michael Fox from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre at Harvard Medical School.

"A lot of pieces of evidence all came together to point to this network playing a role in human consciousness."

Consciousness is generally thought of as being comprised of two critical components - arousal and awareness.

Researchers had already shown that arousal is likely regulated by the brainstem- the portion of the brain that links up with the spinal cord - seeing as it regulates when we sleep and wake, and our heart rate and breathing.

Awareness has been more elusive. Researchers have long though that it resides somewhere in the cortex - the outer layer of the brain - but no one has been able to pinpoint where.

Now the Harvard team has identified not only the specific brainstem region linked to arousal, but also two cortex regions, that all appear to work together to form consciousness.

To figure this out, the team analyzed 36 patients in hospital with brainstem lesions - 12 of them were in a coma (unconscious) and 24 were defined as being conscious.



The researchers then mapped their brainstems to figure out if there was one particular region that could explain why some patients had maintained consciousness despite their injuries, while others had become comatose.

What they found was one small area of the brainstem - known as the rostral dorsolateral pontine tegmentum - that was significantly associated with coma. Ten out of the 12 unconscious patients had damage in this area, while just one out of the 24 conscious patients did.

That suggests that this tiny region of the brainstem is important for consciousness, but it's not the full story.

To figure out which other parts of the brain were fully connected to this region, the team looked at a brain map - or connectome - of a healthy human brain, which shows all the different connections that we know of so far in our brains (you can see a connectome in the image at the top of this story).

They identified two areas in the cortex that were linked up to the rostral dorsolateral pontine tegmentum, and were most likely to play a role in regulating consciousness. One was in the left, ventral, anterior insula (AI), and the other was in the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (pACC).

Both of these regions have been linked by previous studies to arousal and awareness, but this is the first time they've been connected to the brainstem.

The team double-checked their work by looking at fMRI scans of 45 patients in comas or vegetative states, and showed that all of them had the network between these three regions disrupted.

It's a pretty exciting first step, but the researchers acknowledge that they now need to verify their find across a larger group of patients.

Independent teams will also need to confirm their results before we can say for sure that these three regions are the physical source of consciousness in our brains.



In the meantime, the research will hopefully lead to new treatment options for patients in comas, and vegetative states which might have otherwise healthy brains but simply can't regain consciousness.

"This is most relevant if we can use these networks as a target for brain stimulation for people with disorders of consciousness," said Fox.

"If we zero in on the regions and network involved, can we someday wake someone up who is in a persistent vegetative state? That’s the ultimate question."
The research has been published in Neurology
Source: Fiona MacDonald

YOUR INPUT IS MUCH APPRECIATED! LEAVE YOUR COMMENT BELOW.

Thứ Ba, 14 tháng 6, 2016

Changing Our Understanding of Consciousness

A new study reports consciousness has dimensions rather than definable levels.



Measuring and defining consciousness has been an ongoing challenge for neuroscientists, philosophers and psychologists for centuries. The concept of levels of consciousness is mostly theoretical, limiting the abilities of researchers to develop objective measurement and understanding of how different global states of consciousness relate to each other.
Diagnostic scales such as the Glasgow Coma Scale rank consciousness based on various behavioural criteria. Professor Jakob Hohwy, School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, and his team have argued that the idea of consciousness levels is wrong. Professor Hohwy and his colleagues believe that unlike the human body’s more objective measurements, such as blood pressure and height, consciousness has dimensions rather than definable levels.



For example, a person in a vegetative state can’t lift their arm when asked, while a conscious person can. But ask either to imagine themselves playing tennis – as a now famous study by co-author Adrian Owen of the University of Western Ontario did – and their brains may well light up in the same way. Clearly, their state of consciousness differs, however both may share an awareness and ability to respond to verbal demands.

The Hohwy team argues that the notion of a single scale doesn’t fit within the little we know about consciousness. Professor Hohwy, who is associate dean of research in the Faculty of Arts and principal investigator of the Philosophy & Cognition lab, argues subjective experience cannot be partial.

“It’s either something you have or you don’t. And if subjective experience can’t be put on a single sliding scale, neither can consciousness,” he said.



The complexity and intangibility of consciousness can lead to the perception that it is a concept belonging only in the world of theoretical academia. However, consciousness research has significant and real-life implications. Gaining a greater understanding of consciousness could lead to more ethical end-of-life decisions for people with severe brain injuries.
“You’re always either conscious or not conscious, but then it’s a matter of how much you’re conscious of, and what you’re doing with that consciousness,” Professor Hohwy said.
Rather than asking how conscious a person is, a better question might be to ask what the person is conscious of. Are they conscious of loved ones’ voices at their bedside, or only unintelligible noises? This could mean additional tests, such as brain imaging, to assess a person’s cognitive abilities.

Source: University of Monash

YOUR INPUT IS MUCH APPRECIATED! LEAVE YOUR COMMENT BELOW.

 
OUR MISSION