Relative new branch of Psychology addresses crime towards a comprehensive explanation of Punishment, Public Policy, and Prevention
Crime is responsible for a significant amount of human suffering in society. The lives of victims and their families can be adversely affected; often in profound ways. Crime can erode social trust in communities and lead to fear amongst the residents. Crime is expensive for police and even more expensive to prosecute and contain. Perpetrators, too, suffer from the effects of their actions as their lives are altered, often permanently, and typically for the worse. It’s important to analyze an evolutionary approach, which will be invaluable for advancing our understanding of why crime occurs and what accounts for the main patterns in offending that we observed.
We need to keep in mind that problematic behaviors can arise as a result of evolved psychological mechanisms operating as they were “designed” by natural and sexual selection. A significant amount of male to male aggression, for instance, reflects selection for intra-sexual competition amongst males because success in such context advances reproductive success. Male to male violence reflects the operation of evolved adaptation working as they were designed to. Problem behaviors can also arise through the operation of conditional adaptations operating as they were designed by natural and sexual selection in response to specific social and ecological environments.
Before we begin considering specific approaches for preventing crime, we think it is useful to recognize three general points regarding an evolutionary approach towards reducing problematic behaviors. First, where it is possible, programs and policies should work with “human nature” rather than against it. Even if we recognize that humans are enormously flexible in their behavioral repertories, there are likely to be certain practices, policies, and social arrangements that work too crudely against the grain of evolved predisposition and proclivities. Hence, this will likely lead to ineffectiveness. A second related point is that it can often be possible to affect “workarounds” that act on the same evolved motivations that lead to problematic behavior, but instead, channeling the behavior along more societally desirable paths is ideal.
Police officers can’t help but think they have a magical effect on the flow of traffic as all they have to do is enter a stream of vehicles in a marked patrol car and the cars around them immediately slow down and become more cautious. Of course there is no magic involved: human behavior is enormously flexible and will change in predictable ways to different features of the situation as they emerge.
There are two interesting strategies (increasing the effort and reducing the rewards of offending) that are fairly explicable from both a rational choice and evolutionary perspective. If a good deal of offending is related to the pursuit of social status, then changing the reward structure of the environment will alter the relative value of criminal actions as a means to increase social standing. Better locks, bars, screens, security measures and so forth. Simple means that offenders find it harder to obtain the rewards of offending.
Efforts to increase the risk of offending such as the implementation of closed-circuit television, improved street lighting, and better opportunity for natural surveillance have shown to be effective in reducing certain types of offending . Strategies to remove excuses for offending such as instructions, signs, notices, and techniques for altering the conscience of individuals have been evaluated less rigorously. However, we suggest that both of these situational crime prevention strategies can be effective for largely the same reasons. Both strategies provide ecological context that enhance prosocial behavior by reinforcing social and moral norms and alerting individuals to the risk of punishment.
There are a large number of different social crime prevention programs that have been developed and are subject to formal evaluations. Most of these programs focus on addressing the known risk factors for offending and there is a good deal of evidence that properly developed and implemented social crime prevention programs that can be effective in reducing offending. From an evolutionary perspective, the importance of developmental focused social crime prevention initiatives cannot be emphasized enough.
Approaches to interventions that largely focus on merely preventing or stopping risky behavior without any consideration of the ‘function’ of that behavior are not likely to be effective. We think that the key contribution of an evolutionary approach is to help us to go beyond our understanding of the developmental risk factors for offending to identify the key causal processes that are most likely to be implicated. For example, prevention programs like education and home visitation provide information about proper prenatal and antenatal care, parenting practices, and health care which create less harsh intrauterine and early childhood environments that, in turn, can promote the development of slower life history strategies.
An evolutionary perspective suggests that the existence of punishment is essential for the viable functioning of any society, small or large. Without the existence of the third-party punishment of individuals who violate important social and moral norms, there will almost certainly be a substantial reduction in cooperation and an increase in unsanctioned punishment. We are not simply suggesting that we should punish norm transgressions because that is how we have evolved to respond to such transgression. Rather, any attempt to abolish punishment is likely to have unintended negative consequences given our evolved predispositions and the evolutionary function of punishment.
Psychological and behavioral adaptations along with cultural practices have evolved in tandem in response to the violation of significant moral norms. One result of this dynamic and evolving interaction of biology and human nature has been a suite of normative systems and institutions specifically designed to prevent, and if necessary, manage serious wrongdoing (crime).
A problem with groups or individuals seeking revenge without the mediation of an impartial agency is that it can lead to a seemingly endless cycle of harmful actions and counteractions that destabilize social networks.
Punishment can be defined loosely as the intentional infliction of sanctions by the state on individuals who have unjustifiably harmed other people. There are numerous normative justifications of punishment including retributivism, consequentialism, and communicative justification.
The focus of the communicative justification of punishment on the well-being of a community means that relationships between moral stakeholders are of critical importance and the role of individual entitlements and duties assumes lesser importance. It is a collectivist approach to resolving disputes between people and arriving towards solutions to ethical problems such as crime. The process of reconciliation involves forgiveness and the willingness of individuals and the state to look beyond the imposition of punishment, or vengeance, to the moral task of repairing damaged relationships between offenders, victims, and the community.
Because humans are cultural species whose behavior is strongly influenced by social and moral norms and the ecological contexts in which they are embedded, changes in these norms can affect significant changes in behavior that can be sustained through cultural and ecological inheritance. Sustained efforts to support and facilitate the development of pro-social norms and change norms that support or facilitate antisocial behavior, are therefore, likely to be one essential component of efforts to reduce the harmful effects of crime. Changes in legal practices have an important role to play in this context. An evolutionary perspective does not provide all the answers. It does offer a coherent, theoretical framework for integrating the basic and applied sciences in a way that can foster the development of a science of intentional change that has implications for our efforts to reduce offending and the various harms that arise from crime and its management.
By: Jaime F. Adriazola
American Graduate University, Washington DC
References:
Evolutionary Criminology, Russil Durrant / Tony Ward
The Psychology of criminal conduct; New Providence NJ, Mathew Bender & Company Inc.
Missing the Revolution: Darwinism for social Scientists, Oxford: University Press
Handbook of evolutionary psychology, D. M. Buss
Why evolution is true; New York: Viking
The evolutionary psychology of violence; Psicothema
Đăng nhận xét